Discount theory, stories of tomorrow
It's Monday and I'm outside of Reno, a parasite on a Wild Blue satellite connection owned by the state of Nevada that has a kick ass bandwith with no apparent limits, and I'm watching some online shows which I can't do easily through my internet connection, and I'm enjoying hearing the sounds of people around me. Check the main site for pictures that I've put up.
If you've digested the link from yesterday's post a question comes up for all of us who start to tell our family about what we are "discovering" - it's the blank stare. It isn't that your close people think your nuts (though your mileage may vary) but rather that the knowledge doesn't give them an action to perform, and worse, it is about an indeterminate future. Why don't most people give a shit that Peak Oil is happening now? Is it that they don't believe it? Is it that they don't care? Hyperbolic discount theory shows how simple the explanation of an unfathomable response can be.
Discount theory says if it isn't happening right now, in an evolutionary context, it is better that you don't do anything. If our neo cortex (the thinking part of you and I) were running the show, and we were hanging out at the fire 30,000 years ago, and a mountain lion track was seen near the camp, we would ACT! Groups would be sent out to kill it or drive it off. Mountain lions are bad and there are babies in camp, so mountain lions have to go. If that were the case, that the thinking part ran the show, we would act on a large number of events that happened every day that were good ideas for future security, but ultimately a huge drain on energy and therefore survival in the short term. You can't chew your food well if you're in reaction. The lion print might be seen a thousand times, even the lion, but there would be a distance that we all deemed OK. We could outrun it or get up a tree or react, but ONLY when the problem was literally ready to eat us. That was good then. We concentrated on eating and making babies, and because of our brain size and trickiness, we were a winning construct.
NOW, in this time, we have no predator to keep us in balance (except ourselves) and we still have the same built in twitch - the hyperbolic discount theory - it has to be really close to bother us and it has to have demonstrated real threat.
Peak oil, global warming, seas becoming sterile are all future worry. Please pass the meat. Don't you look nice tonight honey. Life goes on because in evolutionary terms - that was the winning combination.
So here we are this, wonderfully complex planet eating animal, and we understand with our neo cortex that we needed to act in 1970. We needed not to keep breeding more of us, and we knew that fossil fuels were a flash in the pan for this animal's long term experience. But it didn't bite us in the ass then. And it hasn't bitten us now, yet.
That's why people don't listen or are slow to convince, or if convinced do nothing about it except exhibit a fatalistic view of que sera sera, what will be will be.
So what do you do if you do want us to turn away from this horrible population "adjustment" which is more crudely known as the "die off"? You give up on changing the planets course and you work on changing your own outcome. Start today? What can you do to move to put yourself and those you love in the less likely to die category? If you thought, "savings bonds" your are so fucked.
Yesterday I suggested you work towards relocating in an area that will have less difference between carrying capacity and population (which is called the degree of Overshoot). The second method is more important to me (after all, I'm 57 and a diabetic).
I believe there is a way to get past the Hyperbolic Discount Theory, and it is the way that has been done since very primitive times. Stories. Every culture has stories that teach about the lions and the snakes and creation and the right way of going. Here is why I think stories work when charts and powerpoint demonstrations fail. Stories program right through the neo cortex. They allow the listener to "be there" to put themselves in the story, and when they do that they experience the lion taking a bite and they react to the lion as if it is right there - emotionally. It bypasses the "you see a problem, I don't see a problem NOW" of the discount theory.
What will work better for Al Gore than "An Inconvenient Truth" are stories, fictional accounts of the great transformation to low energy that is coming. Fiction excites and involves the emotions and the neo cortex is not that place. So that is where I am. Ran Prieur did it a little with his unfinished online novel, but I think the stories should be short, stand alone, yet involve a specific set of characters that repeat through many stories. It is the peak oil, die off, soap of words.
So that is what I am thinking of doing. More on this later.







